Home › Journal information

Aims and scope of a pharmacy, biology and chemistry journal

An interdisciplinary journal exists to publish work that advances the pharmaceutical, biological and chemical sciences and the ground where those fields meet. Its aims and scope state which kinds of studies, reviews and short reports it will consider, and they help an author decide whether a manuscript belongs before any submission work begins. Because these three disciplines overlap heavily, scope is usually described by themes rather than by strict departmental borders. This page explains how such a scope is normally framed, what it is designed to exclude, and how to confirm the current wording on the journal's official pages.

Why a journal states its aims and scope

A statement of aims and scope is the first filter in scholarly publishing. It tells readers what to expect, tells reviewers what standard of relevance to apply, and tells editors when a submission sits outside the journal's remit. Without it, a journal would receive manuscripts from unrelated fields and would have to reject them on grounds that were never made clear.

For authors, the statement is a practical planning tool. It is far cheaper to read a scope statement carefully than to prepare a full manuscript for a journal that was never going to consider it. Scope also shapes the readership a paper will reach, because it decides which specialists pay attention to a new issue.

How an interdisciplinary scope is described

Journals that span several disciplines rarely list every subfield. Instead they describe clusters of interest and give examples. A typical grouping might cover the design and testing of medicines, the biology of cells and organisms, and the chemistry used to understand or measure both.

Examples are usually written as themes rather than as an exhaustive inventory, which keeps the scope flexible as a field develops. New methods and new questions appear constantly, and a theme-based description lets a journal consider work that did not exist when the wording was last revised.

Where scope deliberately ends

Every scope also draws a boundary. A pharmacy, biology and chemistry journal is not a general science journal, a clinical case-report journal, or a venue for opinion that is not anchored in evidence. Work that is mainly engineering, social science or pure mathematics may be relevant only when the biological or pharmaceutical question is central.

These boundaries are matters of emphasis, not of quality. A strong study can still fall outside a given journal, and this is why authors are encouraged to check the stated remit rather than assume that shared vocabulary equals shared scope.

Scope fit and the first editorial decision

Most journals apply a preliminary check before full review. Editors ask whether the topic belongs, whether the manuscript is a research or review article of the kind the journal publishes, and whether basic requirements such as an ethics statement are present. A poor scope match is the most common reason a manuscript is returned without review.

This check saves everyone time, but it also means that presentation and framing matter. A paper that clearly signals its place within the journal's themes is easier to route to the right editor than one whose relevance is left implicit.

Questions worth asking before you submit

A short set of questions can settle most doubts about scope fit. Working through them before submission is quicker than learning the answer from a rejection.

• Does the central question belong to pharmacy, biology or chemistry, or to the overlap between them?
• Is the article type one the journal states that it publishes?
• Would a specialist in the journal's field recognise this work as part of their literature?
• Have you matched the terminology in your title and abstract to the journal's own themes?
• Have you read the current scope wording, rather than relying on an older description?

Scope, article type and expectation

Scope and article type are related but distinct. A journal may cover a theme fully and still accept only certain formats within it. The table below sets out how the two ideas differ and what each one decides.

Confirming the details for yourself

Scope statements are revised from time to time, and themes are added or reworded as a field grows. A description you read last year may not match the current text. The authoritative version is always the one the journal publishes itself, not a summary from a third party.

Read the official aims and scope, then read it once more with your own title and abstract beside it. If the fit is obvious to you, it will usually be obvious to an editor as well. If you are uncertain, a brief enquiry to the editorial office before submission is entirely normal and can save considerable time.

A clear scope match is the foundation of a smooth submission. Confirm your topic against the journal's themes, choose the right article type, and make sure the basic ethical and formatting requirements are met. Terms, themes and requirements are set by the publisher and can change, so check the journal's official pages for the current wording before you prepare or send a manuscript.

Read next