Home › Sections & scope

Interdisciplinary work across pharmacy, biology and chemistry

The boundaries between pharmacy, biology and chemistry are convenient labels rather than real walls. Many of the most useful advances come from work that crosses them, using the methods of one field to answer the questions of another. A journal that spans all three is well placed to publish such work, but it also has to judge interdisciplinary manuscripts fairly. This page explains what interdisciplinary research involves and what you should confirm on the journal's official pages.

What makes work interdisciplinary

Interdisciplinary research combines methods, concepts or data from more than one established field to address a question that no single field can answer alone. It is not merely the use of a technique borrowed once, but a genuine integration in which each discipline contributes to the reasoning.

The test is whether the work would lose something important if one of the disciplines were removed. If so, the integration is real; if not, the work may simply belong to one field.

Common combinations

Certain combinations appear again and again in the life sciences. Medicinal chemistry meets biology when a new molecule is tested in a cell model. Analytical chemistry meets pharmacy when a method is developed to verify a product. Computational work meets both when a model is built to predict behaviour before experiments are run.

These combinations are productive because each side brings a different kind of evidence. The challenge is to make the resulting argument coherent rather than a collection of separate reports stitched together.

The strengths of interdisciplinary work

Crossing disciplines can open questions that a single field would not think to ask. It can also produce methods that travel, solving analogous problems in several areas. Because the life sciences are inherently applied, they benefit especially from this kind of exchange.

For authors, working across fields can widen the audience for a paper and increase the chance that it is used. For readers, it provides findings in a form that connects to their own concerns.

The difficulties

Interdisciplinary manuscripts face particular challenges. Reviewers from one field may not be expert in another, so the writing must be accessible to both. Editors have to find reviewers who can judge the whole rather than a part. Expectations about method and evidence can differ between fields, and the same study may be judged by unfamiliar standards.

Authors can help by explaining their methods for a non-specialist audience and by making clear which claims come from which discipline. Clear framing reduces the risk that a sound study is misunderstood.

How the three disciplines connect

The table below illustrates typical connections between the fields. The examples are general, and the specific scope of any journal is defined in its own documentation.

Writing for more than one audience

An interdisciplinary paper must be readable by specialists from several fields. That usually means defining terms that are obvious to one group but not to another, and avoiding shorthand that only insiders understand. The introduction carries more weight, because it has to establish relevance across disciplines.

It also helps to be explicit about which methods come from which tradition, so that reviewers can see the reasoning and evaluate each part against the right standards.

Preparing an interdisciplinary submission

Before submitting, check that the integration is genuine and that each discipline is represented fairly. A paper that uses a technique from another field without engaging its ideas may be better placed in a single-discipline journal.

• Does the paper need more than one discipline to make its case?
• Will specialists from each field understand the framing?
• Are the methods of each discipline described and justified?
• Are claims attributed to the discipline that supports them?
• Is the significance stated for a broad life-sciences readership?

Judging interdisciplinary work fairly

Editors aim to assess such work on its merits rather than by the conventions of a single field. That is easier when the manuscript is clearly structured and honest about its limits. A well-framed interdisciplinary paper is a pleasure to review; a poorly framed one can be rejected not for weakness but for confusion.

Because the way sections and scope are defined differs between journals and can change, confirm the current position on the journal's official pages. If you are unsure which section best fits your work, the editorial office can advise before you submit.

Interdisciplinary research combines methods and ideas from several fields to answer questions none could address alone, and it is a natural fit for a journal spanning pharmacy, biology and chemistry. The main challenge is clear framing for several audiences and honest attribution of claims. Scope definitions are set by the publisher, so confirm the current coverage on the journal's official pages.

Read next